Linux is Obsolete
In 1992, Andrew S. Tanenbaum, recognized computer scientist and author of the Minix microkernel system, wrote a Usenet article on the newsgroup comp.os.minix with the title "Linux is obsolete",[38] which marked the beginning of a famous debate about the structure of the then-recent Linux kernel. Among the most significant criticisms were that: The kernel was monolithic and thus old-fashioned. The lack of portability, due to the use of exclusive features of the Intel 386 processor. "Writing a new operating system that is closely tied to any particular piece of hardware, especially a weird one like the Intel line, is basically wrong."[39] There was no strict control of the source code by any individual person.[40] Linux employed a set of features which were useless (Tanenbaum believed that multithreaded file systems were simply a "performance hack").[41] Tanenbaum's prediction that Linux would become outdated within a few years and replaced by GNU Hurd ...